PDA

View Full Version : In which I tell you about your characters.


Katzenklavier
06-15-2008, 06:26 AM
So I start having this conversation with J. Typically, as most of our talks do, it goes somewhere entirely random quite quickly. And then it finally came to writing out our characters. Finally, it rested on body language. How does body language convey our characters' personality? If these were real people, how would they move and act? Now, I'll readily admit I'm not expert on the subject. I've done a lot of my own original study, but credit quite a bit to my friend Giovanna. Please let me know if you're interested in her site and analysis. I recommend it.

But J found it interesting enough to encourage me to start a thread. So I'll start with a few basic characters that mine interact with a lot. Then, if you want yours analyzed too, send me a request and maybe a sample post. Of course, all this is just observation. I'm not the player of your characters, and only you can determine if you think it's accurate. So. Let's get started.

Pearce Rowe

I picked everybody's favorite rapist psychopath to go first because he would have some of the most distinctive body behaviors, thus some of the easiest for me to determine. Because of his sexual inclinations and forthrightly aggressive nature, he would stand with his back erect and his hips arched forward. His pelvis would lead the rest of his body. His legs would slant back and, were he just rotating his pelvis, his upper body would remain entirely straight. This is to accentuate his height to accentuate his height while drawing attention to his genitals, a subconscious invitation to those around them to animal instincts. With women, he would plant both feet firmly on the ground and move his hips forward even further. With men, it would still be evident, but it would become more relaxed in that his legs would spread further apart and he's probably favor one over the other as he's not actively targeting, but still sex it at the forefront of his thoughts and intentions. His movements would show a clear disregard for the personal space of others. With men, it would take on a very casual air, to indicate a lack of concern and respect. Towards women, it would of course be distinctly sexual, favoring on areas that alert a woman's instincts as prey. Perfect examples include movements are targeted towards the neck/throat and the hollow of the back - both of which are instinctual alert zones. The hollow of the back is a hyper-sensitive area, due to its position as a visual blindspot an area almost completely bereft of the protection of the arms.

Unlike a very deliberate and self-aware seducer, Pearce's movements would not reflect intentional calculation. Meaning, he would stand there and think, "Okay, I'm going to touch her neck to freak her out." It would come as a result of his instincts. He does not play the part of a predator when it is convenient to him. Rather, he is the predator. This ego complex means his body language would be a clear indicator of his emotions and intentions. He focuses on controlling on his facial expressions in order to trick and deceive. Then again, most wouldn't want to look down at his hips to gauge his mood, rather registering this in their subconsciousness. They'd be more inclined to look at his face; the more societally accepted method of gauging truth and emotion. But it would explain why most people are immediately put on the defensive by him.

One last thing that is particularly notable is his gaze behavior. There are four gaze behaviors used to express authority or lack thereof: active domination, passive domination, active submission and passive submission. Active is when you’re looking at a person, passive is when you’re deliberately not. Passive domination is used to dominate people who consciously want attention. It's when someone in a position of power deliberately looks away and addresses someone without looking at them, indicating that person is beneath them and unworthy of their direct gaze/attention. Active domination is essentially to put someone in a very uncomfortable position by steadily maintaining eye contact with them. Depending on its usage, it is used to either indicate aggressive domination or (often misleadingly) honesty and sincerity. Passive domination is used to belittle a subject, while active is used to break their wills.

Pearce always uses active domination. He maintains eye contact constantly, and even when he isn't, it's when he wants the target to see where his eyes go. Gaze is very very central to him. When he's with a woman, returned eye contact equals an open invitation to sexual interaction. Submissive gaze behaviors, such as looking down nervously, would be equally flattering to his ego. Passive domination, on the other hand, is very seldom understood by men coming from women. Pearce would likely mistake it for submissive behavior. If he caught on that it was belittlement, however, it would likely be a deep insult.

Jean Sauveur

Jean Sauveur is a very tall and physically intimidating man. He would be likely to stand erect with a rigid back that borders on uncomfortable. This alludes to his careful need for self-control, as well as his accentuation on public composure. However, his posture and mannerisms would be a lot more fluid, as he is far more sensitive to the behaviors of others when he is focused on them. For instance, when around younger or smaller, he might be inclined to arch his back forehead in an attempt to get on his or her level, both consciously and subconsciously aware of the dominating aspect of his height. Where Pearce would adamantly deny to lessen his intimidation factor, Jean would fluctuate. Most of his tension would automatically go to his back, thus protecting creating an illusion of protecting the hollow and shielding his vulnerabilities from others. It also indicates his constant state of being on guard - always expecting to be attacked from behind. Additionally, it reveals his fear of betrayal and manipulation. When angered, he would be the type to hunch his shoulders, drawing strength into his arms and covering his neck. This represents a shift away from his emotional insecurities and a focus on his aggressive drive. His rage is the bitter product of his own victimization and he's subconsciously expecting to be put in the position of prey again. Hence, his position is intended to dominate the other before that happens.

A lot of Jean's moods could be revealed through pupil and gaze behavior. When he's with those he doesn't hold much interest in, they would remain unusually constricted, indicating his tendency to turn his thoughts inward and remain inside his own head, detaching himself from the present situation. With someone like Manya, they would probably dilate as an indication of both rage and sexual arousal. Given his attitude towards sexuality, he would not be as inclined to lead his body with his pelvis. Instead, his indicators would be a lot more subtle and less aggressive. Dilated pupils are both a sign of sexual arousal and vulnerability - both of which, in the appropriate situations, can come off subconsciously in those around Jean. The pupils dilate when someone is about to cry, and suggest approachability and feeling. With Jean, his sexuality is closed tied to his vulnerability and reluctance to trust, so both would be particularly applicable. In terms of his gaze behavior, Jean does make use of passive domination. In someone he has less regard for, he will generally look away to show his boredom and disinterest. This particularly arises with Maureen Dawson. However, it is not always entirely unconscious. Jean often does that to prove a point, and that is that he is somehow separate from this situation. In most social groups, he would prefer to consider himself the loner. Appearing bored and detached is the best way not only to assert that he is distant, but above. It is one of the must subtle but telling signs of his need for domination and control.

Let's talk a bit about his posture when he sits. When sitting, it is often considered polite for women to fold their hands in their laps, often with a fist. This gesture is a subconscious act of protection for the sex. The more sexually aware woman may use this to draw attention to that area. Men typically do not fold their hands in their lap. When they do, it's often to draw attention to that area. Jean, subsequently, would keep his arms and hands at a distance. Extended arms, such as those that might rest on the back of a seat, indicate comfort with one's surroundings and general confidence. Jean uses this when he feels sure of his company. For some men, it is a method of flirtation. For Jean, it's an extent of his fatherly instincts and a reassuring gesture. He sees it as reaching out towards someone and suggesting a comforting embrace. A more sexually inclined person might see it, however, as a subconscious invitation. When Jean is with someone who does not incite fatherly regard, he is likely to draw his arms into himself as an expression of his introverted and contained nature. Typically, when seated at a table, he would default to resting his chin on his hands: a movement that has been so long associated with deep thought that he does it naturally. Also, it can either indicate interest or disinterest depending on the situation, both of which define Jean's behaviors.


***

Well, there you have it. An absolutely exhausting analysis of two dramatically different characters and how they use their body language. Next on consideration: Essie, Julien, and my very own Manya. If anyone is interested in knowing more, or wants me to analyze their chars, let me know! And feedback is always immensely appreciated.

Daroga
06-15-2008, 06:43 AM
*tackleglomp* Still v. impressed and humbled and yes... our conversations do tend to veer off the beaten track.

You were pretty right on with how I've often seen him act in my head. I find it fascinating to think of the ways we move and how it relates to our personalities and then to convey that into the personalities of the people we create.... just that extra layer to who they are always interests me.

I would make a request but I'll give others a chance to play first. If you get bored though ... *cou--Pieter pweese--gh* ;)

The Khanum
06-16-2008, 04:15 PM
Oh. Oh, that's fun. My internet forbade me from continuing exulting you with praise on AIM, but let me continue here: That is absolutely spot-on, especially the part about the gazes. I'm totes flattered that you included Pearce in your little psychological foray, and now I'm going to be thinking about that whenever I end up posting for him. And I had never really pictured the specifics on how Pearce walks, but you're right, his crotch would so dominate his strides. Typical. XD

Anyways...may I never tire of telling you how much of a genius you are, Mack my dear. I eagerly anticipate more additions. Yessums. :D

MystMoonstruck
06-16-2008, 08:47 PM
I'd give a lot to read a Cat-analysis! I love what you are doing and find it fascinating, as I prefer it when my fellow RPers include body language in as much detail as possible. It certainly helps me visualize more.

Raven Corbett hasn't been very active yet and hasn't been in anything that would stand out. But, Easy "Cat" Tanner certainly has been around!

I'll be happy to wait my turn while the amazing array of characters receive "the treatment". There's Rozaliya and Lazare and Frederick and too many others to list here!

Ubaldo Piangi
06-17-2008, 05:43 AM
I have no clue why this hadn't been thought of before. But I'm very glad that it's here now, Mack! ^^

I'd offer up Victoria, but I haven't played her very much lately and I don't know how much substance she really has. I should get back to playing her more often; maybe I'll try and bring her into one of the open RP threads at the Masquerade if I can get the inspiration for her. I digress...

However, in the meantime I would LOVE. LoveloveLOVE. To see what sort of analysis is given of Frederick's character. Yus, I would. :D *dumps a pile of plushies on top of Mack*

Mrs Nadir Khan
06-17-2008, 05:47 AM
So cool, Mack! I never really thought of it that way.

Can you do one for Alexander please? *puppy dog eyes*



(Originally, I wrote "Do Alexander!" But I know you too well, Mack. You'd take me up on that one. :D)

IamErik771
06-17-2008, 08:52 AM
Hey, Mack! Don't think we've ever chatted before . . . we should rectify that soon, yes? :D And this is indeed a brilliant topic idea!

I'd love to see what kind of analysis you could come up with for my charries, Victor David Santos (http://www.phantoms-opera.com/showthread.php?t=531) and Sydney Irvine (http://www.phantoms-opera.com/showthread.php?t=2477). Syd's pretty new, and I have to admit I haven't played as Vic in a while . . . but if you can find enough material to analyze, that would be trés awesome. ^_^ And if you want to get more info about my charries by setting up an RP scenario between them and yours, that would be great too. ;)

Katzenklavier
06-17-2008, 10:07 PM
Hmmmmm...Cyn, I'm going to wait and RP with Cat a bit more, so I can get a better feel for him. But it's coming up, yes yes. It is a lot easier for me to analyze charries that I've had a line with. And I'd love to arrange something, James! We absolutely have to chat sometime and come up with some evil plottery. ^_^ That would be a big help in analyzing Victor and/or Sydney. In the meantime, I'm going to focus on Alex and Fred. First up...

Alexander Sokoll

Now, Frederick and Alexander share something in common that's different from Jean or Pearce. Pearce's movements are a very direct reflection of his desire and personality. Jean, as a patron of the arts and trained in high-class bearing, is conscious of his physical presence. But not to the extent that Alexander and Frederick have been trained. Alexander's body language is a result of extensive conditioning in ballet. Since I don't know much about ballet, it's a bit more difficult to actually gauge his body movements. But I'll do my best given the knowledge that I have about him.

Alexander has confidence in his art, but not generally in social situations. In that respect, he offers a direct contrast to Frederick. Fred offstage and on maintains similar behaviors because he is constantly performing. Alexander draws a very distinct line between when he's in the spotlight, and when he's not. When he's offstage, he relaxes into his more natural set of behaviors. He tends to stand erect, but with a slight curve in his back due to his training. His arms are often drawn into himself, and he favors either folding them over his chest or holding them at his sides. This indicates his general discomfort and his tendency to draw inward emotionally as well as physically. Since he is an introvert, it is easier for him to become over-stimulated by crowded surroundings and social situations, thus his body language is often closed so that he can feel more protected. Rather than someone like Frederick, often thrusts his chest forward, Alexander would prefer to keep his chest level and arms drawn in protectively. This indicates a general reluctance to enter a compromising situation, be it emotionally or physically.

Where Pearce and Jean are both examples of men with dominant behavior patterns, Alexander is more submissive. That doesn't necessarily mean he's a wimp. He is just more generally withdrawn from conversations and doesn't make a point to intimidate people. He keeps his legs closer together, not emphasizing his already considerable height. Nor does he focus so much on maintaining eye contact. He has difficulty establishing and maintaining eye contact. Although he smiles often in the presence of strangers or those he isn't comfortable with, it is with his mouth and not with his eyes. His gaze tends towards the bridge of the nose. However, as he gradually eases into a situation, his body language will open up and he'll feel less threatened with eye contact. This is especially true in a comfortable romantic situation. Alexander is likely to wait for the woman to display her interest, ease into their relation, and take her initiative. Once this is done, his body fully opens as he responds to her cues.

This all changes, however, once Alexander gets on stage. The interesting dichotomy with him is his lack of confidence in social situations, and his competent ease in his art. This is especially demonstrated in the comfort and security he has when wearing a very revealing leotard. Even with his genitals exposed in a way that would generally make those of his body behavior feel very uncomfortable, he remains calm and uncaring, almost utterly unaware of any sexual implications. Alexander is not as sexually motivated so much as he is emotionally in relationships. He seeks security and emotional reinforcement. Therefore, his body language does not openly invite sexual advances. His ease with his suit is a nonchalant one of someone accustomed to a symbol of the ballet - not necessarily a display of comfort with his sexuality or even himself. To be nude would cause a different reaction entirely. Yet it demonstrates that his vulnerability disappears when he immerses himself in his performance element. Performing, his body language is open and fluid, indicating his level of comfort and familiarity.

Next up: Frederick Worthington

Mrs Nadir Khan
06-17-2008, 10:38 PM
You were so right about Alexander and eye contact. He will make it, but it takes a minute. I usually write him looking at the forehead or nose first but then catching and getting locked on the eyes of who ever he’s talking with. And my GAWD. He DOES smile a lot. Thank you so much, Mack!

MaskedNicci
06-17-2008, 10:44 PM
Oooh..character analysis! I love this idea very much, being a bit odd about my study of the people I see around me. :) A friend of mine says I 'psycho-analyze' her. *shrug* I can't wait to see the other characters you write these for.

Isabella Delancy
06-29-2008, 02:44 AM
I'm thinking Isabella Delancy is in great need of a psychoanalysis whenever you have the time to do so...very intrigued to know what you make of her.